Histoires cliniques


Mon histoire clinique débute en 2007. A ce moment, j’ai 48 ans,  trois grands enfants, et travaille comme médecin en faculté de médecine.

Début janvier 2007, je développe brutalement des « troubles anxio-dépressifs » intenses et invalidants : je dors peu, mes journées se terminent par des crises de larmes, la fatigue et l’irritabilité sont intenses. Le bilan médical général s’avère sans particularité. Je consulte alors un psychiatre qui pose  un diagnostic de «  troubles anxio dépressifs trouvant leur origine dans des stress professionnels intenses et répétés » .Un arrêt de travail est prescrit et une psychothérapie de soutien est entamée. Je souhaite néanmoins reprendre au plus vite mes activités professionnelles, même si les symptômes ressentis affectent gravement ma qualité de vie.

Au début 2009, je constate à plusieurs reprises que ma tension artérielle atteint régulièrement des valeurs de 200/100 - 210/110. Je consulte un interniste général qui, après un bilan biologique et un enregistrement tensionnel de 24 heures, me dit que « Le bilan est normal et les symptômes à mettre sur le compte du stress professionnel ». Je ne me pose à ce moment pas de question supplémentaire et la vie continue : travail, famille, psychothérapie, mais aussi poussées massives d’hypertension et fatigue de plus en plus prononcée, justifiant  plusieurs consultations qui restent toujours sans autre réponse que celle de « poussées tensionnelles attribuables au stress ».

En 2011, il ne m’est plus possible de continuer à travailler : l’épuisement est intense, tant physique que psychique. Il interfère avec  chaque geste du quotidien. J’ai le sentiment d’être « usée jusqu’à l’os ». Je décide de quitter mon travail à l’université.

Je consulte une nouvelle fois, cette fois un spécialiste des problèmes d’hypertension artérielle . Il posera deux diagnostics  susceptibles l’un et l’autre d’expliquer les poussées tensionnelles : dysplasie fibro-musculaire des artères rénales s’accompagnant d’ « anévrysmes viscéraux multiples » et   glomérulonéphrite chronique .

Un traitement par Candésartan cilexetil est rapidement instauré et mon état s’améliore progressivement : les poussées  tensionnelles disparaissent, les anomalies rénales se corrigent, la fatigue régresse. En 2015, je me sens bien et mon état est considéré comme stabilisé. J’entreprends un bénévolat dans une association humanitaire, activité que je poursuis depuis.

Depuis 2014, mon suivi médical inclut, outre le traitement médicamenteux contre l’hypertension, un contrôle annuel de la fonction rénale et de la taille des anévrismes . Ce dernier contrôle impose la réalisation, chaque année, d’un examen type angio-CTscan ou angio-IRM .

En 2017, la situation reste stable et tout va bien !

Le plus difficile à vivre est l’incertitude qui existe actuellement encore au sujet de la DFM : la maladie évolue-t-elle ? Y -a-t-il des facteurs prédictifs du risque d’évolution ? Peut-on faire quelque chose pour les éviter ? ..

Face à toutes ces questions, le soutien apporté par d’autres patients atteints de DFM s’avère pour moi fort important : la possibilité de discuter de nos histoires , des examens à venir, des évolutions respectives,.. apaise ma crainte de l’inconnu  .

Enfin, le fait de pouvoir compter sur un médecin qui connait bien la DFM et est capable d’entendre toutes les questions et les craintes est pour moi un soutien très précieux.

Le texte qui suit sera bientôt disponible en français.


My BP has always had a tendency to increase when at the doctor’s office. It’s for this reason that I monitor my BP at home. I noticed that it was raised, varying between 160/100 and 145/95 (previously I was told over 140/80 was too high) so I took an appointment with my family doctor. My BP was 190/110 in her office. I was started on anti-hypertensive medication and I was referred to a cardiologist for a cardiac assessment. My BP was 185/110 in the cardiologist’s office, the nurse kept saying “it’s 185/110” which of course was why I was there! He explained it could be due to an uncommon, but possible cause of hypertension in younger women (I was 47 years old – so not that young!). I would need a kidney scan. He prescribed a beta blocker on top of the antihypertensive. 
I googled causes of hypertension in “younger” women and found fibromuscular dysplasia. Thanks to the FMDSA and the INSPRE site I was able to find information on the disease. The first thing I realized was how very different it can be for everyone depending on which arteries are involved. It was also clear that those within the FMD world were saying it is really important to be seen by a physician with FMD experience. 
Once my renal scan results where back, the cardiologist called to tell me I did in fact have a very important stenosis in my right renal artery. Which was suggestive of fibromuscular dysplasia, but that my kidney was a normal size which indicated no damage. He told me that either I would need to stay on the antihypertensive medications or they may consider a small procedure to try to dilate the narrowing. He wanted me to see a nephrologist. 
The nephrologist showed me the scan, one stenosis of the right renal artery (indicating a focal lesion) despite this the kidney was within normal size. He felt it would be best to refer me to an FMD experienced colleague in Brussels. He explained that they would usually check the carotid and vertebral arteries also – so I had an echo Doppler of those. 
 I had searched and read as much as could find about renal artery FMD. Not being medically trained some of the published articles were heavy going!  
Following my appointment with the specialist, I had a scan of my carotid and vertebral arteries. It felt like a very long 3 weeks waiting for the results, every headache or twinge in my neck convinced me I would have it in other arteries. Luckily though, there was no further FMD detected.   It was suggested I undergo a PTA (Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty) to improve the  blood supply to the kidney. I had already read that in some cases (and more often in focal FMD or recent onset of hypertension) this could improve BP and for some it could mean normal BP without medication. It would be a 2-3 day stay in hospital.  
In November 2015 I had the angioplasty, the next day I was allowed home. I now had an antiplatelet and aspirin added to my medications. There was a bit of confusion as to whether I’d had a stent or not once back on the ward, as they were more used to 
cardiac procedures. I was sure there was no stent, it had been awkward and it was talked about during the procedure, but wasn’t needed, which I was relieved about as I remembered reading it wasn’t recommended in renal arteries unless there was a dissection. It was fascinating to be aware of what was going on during the angioplasty, but also a bit surreal if I’m honest! I chose not to have any medication to relax me beforehand. 
The next morning I was able to go home – when I asked about the BP medication, I was told to continue with it and if any problems contact my doctor. I had a few days taking things very slowly, my BP was lower, but not drastically, however every time I stood up or moved I felt dizzy – very dizzy. If I moved very slowly getting up was a bit better, so I had to try moving about slowly. My BP continued to drop and I was getting very cold fingers and toes, with numbness and pins and needles. My family doctor advised we halve the ace inhibitor meds to see if that helped. It did slightly. The circulation in my hands and feet improved a bit. She explained that it can take a while for your body to adjust to having a lower BP. This was not something I’d thought about prior to the procedure. 
After my first follow up appointment at the hospital I was able to stop more of the medication, and following a home 24 BP hour monitoring I was able to stop the remaining BP medication.  I underestimated how long it would take for my body to adjust to the change in blood pressure and stopping the medications, and honestly it took almost 6 months until I felt really “back to normal” and up to exercising regularly again!  
Following my latest appointment, my blood pressure is still ok without medication. Follow up appointments will continue yearly, as for other FMD patients, and if I’m lucky that will be my FMD story. 
I keep my fingers crossed that my renal artery stenosis stays away, extra crossed if I’m honest as focal FMD does seem to have a higher risk of progression. I see from others experiences I have been fortunate, no dissections or aneurysms, and for now, no other artery involvement. The hardest thing is living with the fact that I have FMD and have no idea what that may involve in the future, but with the yearly follow up appointments we will hopefully get advance warning of any possible changes. 
I also realise I was lucky to have had a good experience with the health service here, something that is not always the case. I have seen and heard of others having to wait years for a confirmed diagnosis, and even when one is given the treating physicians may have little or no previous experience of FMD. 
When I was asked to be included in the European FMD registry I was very happy to have my details and DNA added, anything I can do to further the knowledge and subsequent treatments of this “rare/underdiagnosed” condition the better.